Imagining a Science of Instructional Design
PROCEEDINGS
Dennis Dicks, Concordia University, Canada ; Franca Garzotto, Politecnico di Milano, Italy ; John Hedberg, Macquarie University, Australia ; Yong Zeng, Concordia Institute for Information Systems Engineering, Canada
EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Montreal, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-56-3 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
Abstract
Instructional design (ID) in its short life has been dominated by behaviorist approaches (e.g. Dick and Carey and ISD models) despite critiques focusing on issues of practice as well as theory. In the past decade, a number of alternative approaches to teaching and practice have grown out of research with a more cognitivist or constructivist flavor. Nonetheless, little research has addressed the questions "What constitutes good instructional design?" "How do we create it?" This panel representing research in varied design domains (software, performance art, industrial products, as well as ID) will describe a growing body of work on design as an intellectual discipline in fields other than instruction, and suggest how new ideas and methods could contribute to the development of a "science of ID".
Citation
Dicks, D., Garzotto, F., Hedberg, J. & Zeng, Y. (2005). Imagining a Science of Instructional Design. In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2005--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 960-965). Montreal, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 28, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/20204/.
© 2005 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Akin, O. & Akin, C. (1996). Frames of reference in architectural design: analyzing the hyperacclamation. (A-h-a!) Design Studies 17: 341-361.
- Arnheim, R. (1995). Sketching and the psychology of design in V. Margolin & B. Buchanan (eds) The Idea of Design MIT pp. 70-74.
- Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions. J. Learning Science 2: 141-178.
- Dick, W. & Carey, L. (1978). The Systematic Design of Instruction. (1 s t edition) Glenview, Scott, Foresman.
- Dick, W. (1996). The Dick and Carey model: will it survive the decade? Educational Technology Research and Development 44: (3).
- Dicks, D.J. (2003). A comparative evaluation of ‘on-line’ and on-campus versions of an MBA program. Proceedings of the Second Aviation Management Education and Research Conference, Montreal, July 2528. Dicks, D.J., (2002). Instructional designs for laptop courseware. ThinkPad Thinktank Conference, Laval University, June 2-4.
- Doucet, R.M. & Ranker, R.A. (1990). SOCRATES: An instructional design advisor program. Computers in Human Behavior, 6: 201-206.
- Duchastel, P.C. (1990). Cognitive design for instructional design. Instructional Science, 19: 437-444.
- Eckert, C. & Stacey, M. (2000). Sources of inspiration: a language of design. Design Studies, 21 (5): 523538.
- Giordano, D. (2002). Evolution of interactive graphical representations into a design language: a distributed cognition account. International J. Human-Computer Studies 57: 317-345
- Giordano, D. & Shaw, S.G. (2000). Organizational learning: the importance of observing emergent process. Proceedings, 3rd International Conference on the Practical Applications of Knowledge Management, 181184.
- Goldschmidt, G. (1994). On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture. Design Studies, 15 (2): 160-174.
- Jonassen, D. (2002). Integration of problem solving into instructional design. In Reiser, R.A., & Dempsey, J.V. Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, Merrill Prentice Hall. Pp. 107-120.
- Langshaw, P.K. (2004). Http://pklangshaw.com website accessed 15 October 2004.
- Li, Z., O'Neal, H.F & Baker, E.L. (1991). Developing a research reference interface for knowledge-based instructional design tools. Educational Technology, 31(8): 7-16.
- Pereira, L.Q. (2000). Alternative method for design activity research: the limits of protocol research. In Pizzocaro et al., (eds.) Proceedings of the Design plus Research conference, Politecnico di Milano, May 18-20 pp.43-48.
- Pirolli, P.L. & Greeno, J.G. (1990). The instructional design environment: Technology to support design
- Purcell, T. & Gero, J.S. (1996). Design and other types of fixation. Design Studies, 17: 363-383
- Racine, M. & Findeli, A.. (2003). Julien Hébert and the Emergence of Industrial Design in Canada. Design Issues, 19 (4).
- Reigeluth, C.M. (1996). A New Paradigm of ISD? Educational Technology, 36 (3): 13-20.
- Reiser, R.A., & Dempsey, J.V. (2002). Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology. Merrill Prentice Hall.
- Richey, R. (1986). The Theoretical and Conceptual Bases of Instructional Design. London: Kogan Page.
- Rowland, G. (1992). What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of expert practice Performance Improvement Quarterly 5 (2), 65-86.
- Rowland, G. (1993). Designing and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development. 41(1), 79-91.
- Rowland, G., Parra, M.L. & Basnet, K. (1994). Educating instructional designers: different methods for different outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, July-Aug.
- Schon, D. (1988). Toward a marriage of artistry and applied science in the architectural design studio. J. Architectural Education, 41 (4).
- Shavelson, R.J., Philips, D.C., Towne, L., & Feuer, M.J. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher. 32 (1) Jan/Feb: 25-28.
- Shaw, S.G., Giordano, D. & Faro, A. (1999). A new approach to case-based instruction. Presentation, International Society for Performance and Instruction, Montreal.
- Shaw, S.G. & Shaw, D.R. (1992). A total quality approach to managing computer-based training development. In Shaw, M. & Roper, E. (eds.) Aspects of Educational Technology and Training, XXVI: Quality in Education and Training, London: Kogan Page.
- US Airforce (1975). Instructional system development and technology. Washington, UF Manual 50-52.
- Willis, J. & Wright, K.E. (2000). A general set of procedures for constructivist instructional design: the new R2D2 model. Educational Technology, 40 (2), March-April.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References