Exploring the Impacts of Social Networking Sites on Academic Relations in the University
ARTICLE
Patient Rambe, University of the Free State, South Africa
JITE-Research Volume 10, Number 1, ISSN 1539-3585 Publisher: Informing Science Institute
Abstract
Social networking sites (SNS) affordances for persistent interaction, collective generation of knowledge, and formation of peer-based clusters for knowledge sharing render them useful for developing constructivist knowledge environments. However, notwithstanding their academic value, these environments are not necessarily insulated from the exercise of academic/ power. Despite a growing corpus of literature on SNS’s capacity to enhance social capital formation, foster trust, and connect interactants in remote locations, there is a dearth of research on how SNS potentially leverages academic /power relations in university settings. Mindful of the unsubstantiated nexus between power relations, knowledge construction, and academic appropriation of SNS, unraveling the impact of SNS on lecturer-student and student-peer power relations in the university can illuminate the understanding of this academic connection/puzzle. This work employs Critical Theory of Technology (CTT) and virtual case study method to explore the influence of SNS use on power relations of lecturers, students, and their peers in a blended (Facebookenhanced) Information Technology course at a middle-sized South African university. The findings demonstrate that academic appropriation of SNS differentially empower academics and students at different times, and students employ various forms of sophisticated authorial language to territorialise power in their interactions with lecturers and peers. Academics and instructional designers are urged to examine different forms of language employed in lecturer-student and student-peer discourses to grasp student learning needs and to foster meaningful, knowledge-rich learning environments.
Citation
Rambe, P. (2011). Exploring the Impacts of Social Networking Sites on Academic Relations in the University. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 10(1), 271-293. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved March 28, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/111522/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Acker, S.R., & Miller, M.D. (2005). Campus learning spaces: Investing in how students learn. Educause Centre for Applied Research, Research Bulletin 2005, (8), 1-11.
- Arendt, H. (1976). On the concept of power. In J. Habermas (1983). Philosophical-political profiles. (Trans: F.G. Lawrence). London: Heinemann.
- Barry, B. (2001). Political machines: Governing a technological society. London: Athlone Press.
- Beckenham, A. (2008). Face off online: Pedagogy and engagement in social network sites, in Engaging Communities, Proceedings of the 31st HERDSA Annual Conference, Rotorua, 1-4 July 2008, pp. 6670.
- Bosch, T. (2008). Wots ur ASLR? Adolescent girls’ use of cell phones in Cape Town. Proceedings of the e/merge online conference. July 7-18. Retrieved from http://emerge2008.net/access/content/group/emerge2008/PresentationFiles/Bosch/MXit-%20Bosch.pdf Bosch, T. (2009). Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town. Seminar presented at the University of Cape Town, April 16, 2009.
- RambeBoyd, D.M., & Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11. Retrieved July 01, 2010, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html
- Bishop-Russell, J., Dubord, M., Hansen, E., & Webster, K. (2006). Acknowledging a campus.com(munity): [thefacebook] and diversity college. The University of Maine. Retrieved May 13, 2010, from www.studentaffairs.com/vcs/2006entries/UniversityofMaine.ppt
- Brey, P. (2008). The technological construction of social power. Social Epistemology, 22(1), 71–95.
- Cain, J. (2008). Online social networking issues within academia and pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education; 72(1), 1-7.
- Carpenter, C., & Drezner, D.W. (2010). International Relations 2.0: The implications of new media for an old profession. International Studies Perspectives, 11, 255–272.
- Centre for Educational Technology. (2009). Projects. Retrieved March 12, 2010, from http://www.cet.uct.ac.za/projects#MobileLearning Chickering, A.W., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Chigona, A., & Chigona, W. (2008). Mix it up in the media: Media discourse analysis on a mobile instant messaging system. The Southern African Journal of Information and Communication, Issue 9, 42-57.
- Cummins, J. (1997). Minority status and schooling in Canada. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 28(3), 411-430.
- Dusek, V. (2006). Philosophy of technology: An introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
- Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook friends: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12(4), article 1. Retrieved May 3, 2010, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html
- Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. New York: Longman.
- Fairclough, N.L. (1995). Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
- Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. New York: Routledge.
- Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Feenberg, A. (2003). What is technology? Lecture for the Komaba undergraduates, June 2003. Retrieved November 17, 2009, from http://www.sfu.ca/~andrewf/books/What_is_Philosophy_of_Technology.pdf Feenberg, A. (2005). Critical theory of technology: An overview. Tailoring Biotechnologies, 1(1), 47-64.
- Feenberg, A., & Barney, D. (2004). Community in the digital age: Philosophy and Practice. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
- Flynn, L.J. (2008). MySpace mind-set finally shows up at the office. New York Times. Retrieved June 15, 2009, from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/09/technology/techspecial/09socialprise.html?_r=3 & Ref=techspecial
- Foucault, M. (1981). The history of sexuality: An introduction. London: Penguin.
- Foucault, M. (2003). The essential Foucault: Selections from the essential works of Foucault. In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds). New York: The New Press.
- Gratham, C. (2009). Incorporating critical theory of technology into educational leadership: Examining the technical codes of the open journal system. Access to knowledge: A Course Journal, 1(2), 1-11.
- Habermas, J. (1983). Philosophical-political profiles (Trans: F.G. Lawrence). London: Heinemann.
- Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Volume 1): Reason and the rationalisation of society. (Trans: T. McCarthy). London: Heinemann Educational Books.
- Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
- Hewitt, A., & Forte, A. (2006). Crossing boundaries: Identity management and student/faculty relationships on the Facebook. CSCW'06, Banff, Alberta: Canada, 1-2.
- Hurt, C., & Yin, T. (2006). Blogging while untenured and other extreme sports. Washington University Law Review, 84, 1235–1255.
- Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Retrieved June 8, 2011, from http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm
- Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T.W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
- Kolek, E.A., & Saunders, D. (2008). Online disclosure: An empirical examination of undergraduate Facebook profiles. NASPA Journal, 45(1), 1-25.
- Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Social networking websites and teens: An overview. Pew Internet and American life research. Pew Internet Project Data memo, January 3, 2007.
- Lipkin D. (2006). A closer look: Facebook may mar even the best of resumes. Daily Bruin. Retrieved July 17, 2009, from http://www.dailybruin.ucla.edu/news/2006/jan/25/a-closer-look-Facebook-may-mar/ Otto, L., & Featherman, D. (1975). Social structural and psychological antecedents of self estrangement and powerlessness. American Sociological Review, 40(6), 701-719.
- Peluchette, J., & Karl, K. (2008). Social networking profiles: An examination of student attitudes regarding use and appropriateness of content. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(1), 95-97.
- Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2002). Behaviour online: Does anonymous computer communication reduce gender inequality? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1073-1083.
- Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of Computer mediated communication. Communication Research, 25(6), 689-715.
- Rambe, P. (2008). The challenges of using weblogs for learning in tertiary settings in Africa. Themed issue: Science, technology and society in Africa. Postamble, 4 (1), 64-79.
- Read, B. (2006). Think before you share. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(20), A38-41.
- Riva, G., & Galimberti, C. (1998). Computer-mediated communication: Identity and social interaction in an electronic environment. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 124, 434-464.
- Rosenbloom, S. (2007). On Facebook, Scholars Link Up With Data. The New York Times, December 17, 2007. Retrieved July 12, from http://shawndra.pbworks.com/f/On+Facebook,+Scholars+Link+Up+With+Data++New+York+Times. Pdf
- Selwyn, N. (2007). Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for informal learning-A critical review. Paper presented at the OECD-KERIS International Expert Meeting on ICT and Educational Performance, Cheju Island, South Korea. Retrieved July 1, 2010, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.117.9470 & Rep=rep1 & Type=pdf
- RambeShort, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: John Wiley& Sons.
- Simon, R.I., & Dippo, D. (1986). On critical ethnographic work. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 17, 195-202.
- Vandeleur, S. (2010). Indigenous technology and culture in the technology curriculum: Starting the conversation. A case study. PhD Thesis, Rhodes University.
- Van Dijk, T.A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H.E. Hamilton (Eds). Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352-371). Blackwell Publishers.
- Winter, S.L. (1996). The "power" thing. Virginia Law Review, 82(5), 721-835.
- Wodak, R., & Ludwig, C. (Ed.) (1999). Challenges in a changing world: Issues in Critical Discourse Analysis. Vienna: Passagenverlag. Biography Dr. Patient Rambe holds a PhD in Educational Technology from the
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References